G2TT
来源类型Articles
规范类型论文
DOI10.1007/978-90-481-8826-0_5
ISBN978-90-481-8825-3
Local knowledge and scientific perceptions: questions of validity in environmental knowledge
Verma, R.; Russell, D.; German, L.
发表日期2010
出处German, L.A., Ramisch, J.J. and Verma, R. (eds.) Beyond the biophysical: knowledge, culture, and politics in agriculture and natural resource managemen. 99-125
出版者Springer, London, UK
出版年2010
语种英语
摘要

Local ecological knowledge has been subject to a great deal of debate in recent decades. Early strands of this literature could be easily classified into two camps – one which purports the adaptive logic and scientific validity of local knowledge, and the other which seeks to expose its flaws by illustrating its divergence from scientific understandings. While acknowledging subsequent attempts to question this dichotomy (Agrawal (Development and Change 26:413–439, 1995); Long (Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, 2001); Pottier et al. (Negotiating Local Knowledge: Power and Identity in Development. London: Pluto Press, 2003)), this chapter maintains the distinction as a means of exploring claims to validity of diverse bodies of knowledge. It does this through a series of case studies on biophysical processes that have been subject to much debate and misunderstanding in both public and scientific spheres. Local and scientific knowledge are juxtaposed in two ways. By highlighting biophysical processes for which local and scientific understandings diverge but for which local ecological knowledge is nevertheless functionally sound, the adaptive capacity of local knowledge is illustrated. As is shown, empirical foundations to local ecological knoweldge may be found even behind purportedly “erroneous” perceptions of cause and effect. Secondly, by exposing the subjectivities of scientific understandings on certain biophysical processes, the grounding of even the most “objective” knowledge in perceptual and political biases is illustrated. Case studies on shifting agriculture, watershed function, and ecological processes that challenge our predictive capacities help to illustrate both the scientific foundations of local knowledge and the “perceptual” foundations of science. The intention is neither to discredit scientific understandings nor to place undue emphasis on the merits of local ways of knowing, but rather to expose the unfair value judgements leveraged against the latter historically – and to call for a more even playing field in the politics of environmental knowledge.

主题shifting cultivation ; indigenous knowledge ; watershed management
URLhttps://www.cifor.org/library/3133/
来源智库Center for International Forestry Research (Indonesia)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/91593
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Verma, R.,Russell, D.,German, L.. Local knowledge and scientific perceptions: questions of validity in environmental knowledge. 2010.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
9789048188253.jpg(8KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Verma, R.]的文章
[Russell, D.]的文章
[German, L.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Verma, R.]的文章
[Russell, D.]的文章
[German, L.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Verma, R.]的文章
[Russell, D.]的文章
[German, L.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 9789048188253.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。