Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Articles |
规范类型 | 论文 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.014 |
ISSN | 0959-3780 |
Land tenure and REDD+: the good, the bad and the ugly | |
CIFOR$ | |
发表日期 | 2013 |
出处 | Global Environmental Change 23(3): 678689 |
出版者 | Springer |
出版年 | 2013 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | A number of international donors, national governments and project proponents have begun to lay the groundwork for REDD+, but tenure insecurity including the potential risks of land grabbing by outsiders and loss of local user rights to forests and forest land is one of the main reasons that many indigenous and other local peoples have publicly opposed it. Under what conditions is REDD+ a threat to local rights, and under what conditions does it present an opportunity? This article explores these issues based on available data from a global comparative study on REDD+, led by the Center for International Forestry Research, which is studying national policies and processes in 12 countries and 23 REDD+ projects in 6 countries. The article analyses how tenure concerns are being addressed at both national and project level in emerging REDD+ programs. The findings suggest that in most cases REDD+ has |
主题 | community forestry ; indigenous people ; tenure rights ; tenure systems ; customary law ; property rights |
URL | https://www.cifor.org/library/4146/ |
来源智库 | Center for International Forestry Research (Indonesia) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/92302 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | CIFOR$. Land tenure and REDD+: the good, the bad and the ugly. 2013. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
09593780.jpg(417KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[CIFOR$]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[CIFOR$]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[CIFOR$]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。