Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Articles |
规范类型 | 论文 |
DOI | 10.5751/ES-05694-180239 |
ISSN | 1708-3087 |
Equity and REDD+ in the media: a comparative analysis of policy discourses | |
Vinceti, B.; Ickowitz, A.; Powell, B.; Kehlenbeck, K.; Termote, C.; Cogill, B.; Hunter, D. | |
发表日期 | 2013 |
出处 | Ecology and Society 18(2): 39 |
出版年 | 2013 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) is primarily a market-based mechanism for achieving the effective reduction of carbon emissions from forests. Increasingly, however, concerns are being raised about the implications of REDD+ for equity, including the importance of equity for achieving effective carbon emission reductions from forests. Equity is a multifaceted concept that is understood differently by different actors and at different scales, and public discourse helps determine which equity concerns reach the national policy agenda. Results from a comparative media analysis of REDD+ public discourse in four countries show that policy makers focus more on international than national equity concerns, and that they neglect both the need for increased participation in decision making and recognition of local and indigenous rights. To move from addressing the symptoms to addressing the causes of inequality in REDD+, policy actors need to address issues related to contextual equity, that is, the social and political root causes of inequality. |
主题 | climate change ; REDD+ ; mitigation |
URL | https://www.cifor.org/library/4186/ |
来源智库 | Center for International Forestry Research (Indonesia) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/92318 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Vinceti, B.,Ickowitz, A.,Powell, B.,et al. Equity and REDD+ in the media: a comparative analysis of policy discourses. 2013. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
17083087.jpg(4KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
ABrockhaus1303.pdf(419KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。