Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Articles |
规范类型 | 论文 |
DOI | 10.5751/ES-06643-190414 |
ISSN | 1708-3087 |
National REDD+ policy networks: from cooperation to conflict | |
Brockhaus, M.; Di Gregorio, M. | |
发表日期 | 2014 |
出处 | Ecology and Society 19(4): 14 |
出版年 | 2014 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) is a financial mechanism aimed at providing incentives to reduce carbon emissions from forests and enhance carbon stocks. In most forest-rich developing countries, policy actors, i.e., state and nonstate as well as international and national, are designing national REDD+ policies. Actors interests and beliefs shape patterns of interactions, ranging from cooperation to conflict, and these interactions influence a countrys direction and progress in REDD+ policy formulation and implementation. We used a comparative policy network approach to analyze the power structures in national REDD+ policy domains in seven countries. We drew on the typology of power structures defined by two dimensions, namely the distribution of power in the policy arena and the dominant type of interaction, cooperative or conflictual, among actors, and we mapped the progress of national REDD+ decision-making processes against these power structures. We tested three hypotheses and found that (1) national ownership over the policy process is a prerequisite for progress. In addition, (2) the level of concentration of power in an actor group can facilitate progress in REDD+; however, particularly when concentration of power is high, progress will be possible only if the interests of the most powerful are aligned with the objectives of REDD+ and address the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation. Furthermore, (3) although cooperation is perceived as ideal in any collective decision-making setting, a certain level of conflict is necessary for progress in REDD+ decision making. This applies particularly in more advanced national REDD+ domains, where, following a honeymoon phase during which most policy actors embrace the broad idea of REDD+, policy decisions must deal with difficult realities associated with negotiating established business-as-usual interests, which entails high political costs. |
主题 | comparisons ; conflict ; cooperation ; policy ; REDD+ |
区域 | Brazil,Cameroon,Indonesia,Nepal,Papua New Guinea,Tanzania,Vietnam |
URL | https://www.cifor.org/library/5100/ |
来源智库 | Center for International Forestry Research (Indonesia) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/92734 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Brockhaus, M.,Di Gregorio, M.. National REDD+ policy networks: from cooperation to conflict. 2014. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
17083087.jpg(4KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
ABrockhaus1404.pdf(3484KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Brockhaus, M.]的文章 |
[Di Gregorio, M.]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Brockhaus, M.]的文章 |
[Di Gregorio, M.]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Brockhaus, M.]的文章 |
[Di Gregorio, M.]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。