Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Articles |
规范类型 | 论文 |
DOI | 10.1080/08941920.2015.1122851 |
ISSN | 0894-1920 |
Can Evidence and Voice Influence Policy? A Critical Assessment of Nepal’s Forestry Sector Strategy, 2014 | |
Nageli, P; Grant, J.; Nichols, J.D.; Sheil, D.; Horton, B. | |
发表日期 | 2016 |
出处 | Society and Natural Resources 29(3): 357-373 |
出版年 | 2016 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | This article examines Nepal’s recently prepared Forestry Sector Strategy (FSS) (as of 2014) in terms of the use of scientific evidence and the quality of stakeholder participation. By reviewing the content and analyzing the context of its development during 20122014, we found that the transitional politics and overt influence of international development agencies dominated the process and content of the FSS. Although the FSS was developed through a significant stakeholder engagement, there was limited use of the available scientific evidence. The FSS was narrowly conceived as a deliverable of supporting aid programs, with limited demand for a politically meaningful policy processes. While civil society groups were consulted, they largely failed to present an independent voice due to their dependence on funding agencies. Our assessment calls for rethinking policy development in a way that facilitates assertive and independent participation by a range of actors and make better use of the available research. |
主题 | community forestry ; development ; policy |
区域 | Nepal |
URL | https://www.cifor.org/library/6018/ |
来源智库 | Center for International Forestry Research (Indonesia) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/93297 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Nageli, P,Grant, J.,Nichols, J.D.,等. Can Evidence and Voice Influence Policy? A Critical Assessment of Nepal’s Forestry Sector Strategy, 2014. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
08941920.jpg(8KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。