G2TT
来源类型Articles
规范类型论文
DOI10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.026
ISSN0264-8377
Conservation tenders in low-income countries: Opportunities and challenges
Korhonen-Kurki, K.; Brockhaus, M.; Muharrom, E.; Juhola, S.; Moeliono, M.; Maharani, C.; Dwisatrio, B.
发表日期2017
出处Land Use Policy 63: 672-678
出版年2017
语种英语
摘要

The number of payments for environmental service schemes (PES) in low-income countries has grown more rapidly than in high-income countries. Yet, scarce funding among potential service buyers in low-income countries arguably makes it even more important to design PES cost-effectively. Tendering conservation contracts is one possible way to improve the cost-effectiveness of PES schemes. There is reason to believe that they are particularly well-suited to overcome some typical constraints in low-income environments. However, experience with conservation tenders in low-income countries remains limited to a handful of scientifically motivated experimental trials. Larger roll-outs can so far only be found in high-income countries, mainly the US and Australia. How different would rolled-out PES tenders perform in low-income countries, and would they require distinct design features? Here, we identify specific opportunities and challenges for implementing conservation tenders in low-income countries. Conceptually, we examine each implementation step of a tendered PES for typical low-income country characteristics. Some may affect the design requirements for successful implementation, in either positive or negative ways, compared with the typical high-income country case. Imperfect markets and information about production systems, high subsistence incomes, high variability in prices and yields, and risk-averse behavior all constitute characteristics which conservation tenders may be particularly suited to address. Conversely, lack of expertise and infrastructure can hamper tender design and the dissemination of information to potential participants. Some of these challenges can be dealt with, but solutions unavoidably increase transaction costs which, in turn, may affect scalability. While tenders reduce poverty alleviation effects when informational rents of service providers are being squeezed, tendered PES programs do not reduce rents to zero under normal circumstances, and can therefore still deliver income transfers and contribute to poverty alleviation.

主题ecosystem services ; income ; conservation ; auctions
URLhttps://www.cifor.org/library/6492/
来源智库Center for International Forestry Research (Indonesia)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/93634
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Korhonen-Kurki, K.,Brockhaus, M.,Muharrom, E.,et al. Conservation tenders in low-income countries: Opportunities and challenges. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
02648377.jpg(307KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Korhonen-Kurki, K.]的文章
[Brockhaus, M.]的文章
[Muharrom, E.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Korhonen-Kurki, K.]的文章
[Brockhaus, M.]的文章
[Muharrom, E.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Korhonen-Kurki, K.]的文章
[Brockhaus, M.]的文章
[Muharrom, E.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 02648377.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。