| 来源类型 | Articles
|
| 规范类型 | 论文
|
| ISBN | 978-602-387-079-0
|
| Pathway to impact: Is REDD+ a viable theory of change? |
| Dermawan, A.; Hospes, O.
|
| 发表日期 | 2018
|
| 出处 | A. Angelsen, C. Martius, V. de Sy, A.E. Duchelle, A.M. Larson, Pham T.T. (eds.) Transforming REDD+: Lessons and new directions. 17-28
|
| 出版者 | Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia
|
| 出版年 | 2018
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | Key messages - A REDD+ theory of change is expected to outline pathways using conditional incentives to achieve reduced emissions. But as practised, REDD+ has evolved into a diversity of measures, while the core element, conditionality, has rarely been applied.
- Confusion arises when actors fail to distinguish between REDD+ as the outcome of reduced emissions and the framework to achieve them. Convoluted objectives, unclear donor commitments, and competing ideas about what REDD+ is and should pay for (compensation level, beneficiaries), complicate its implementation.
- The way forward lies in recognising ideological differences for more constructive debates, clarifying technical objectives and embracing pragmatism in implementation.
|
| 主题 | climate change
; ecosystem services
; mitigation
; emissions
; forests
|
| URL | https://www.cifor.org/library/7062/
|
| 来源智库 | Center for International Forestry Research (Indonesia)
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/93970
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Dermawan, A.,Hospes, O.. Pathway to impact: Is REDD+ a viable theory of change?. 2018.
|
|
文件名：
|
BAngelsen180102.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
