G2TT
来源类型Articles
规范类型论文
ISBN978-602-387-079-0
Results-based payment: Who should be paid, and for what?
Dermawan, A.; Hospes, O.
发表日期2018
出处A. Angelsen, C. Martius, V. de Sy, A.E. Duchelle, A.M. Larson, Pham T.T. (eds.) Transforming REDD+: Lessons and new directions. 41-54
出版者Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia
出版年2018
语种英语
摘要

Key messages

  • Results-based payment (RBP), the main innovation brought by REDD+, has also been the most challenging to implement. Three key challenges for RBP are: what to pay for, how to set reference levels, and whom to pay; these challenges are at risk of biases, including a ‘cherry picking’ of numbers.
  • Current and emerging RBP initiatives are hybrid approaches. As such, they make compromises on key RBP principles, such as payment based solely on results, recipient discretion (on how to achieve results) and independent verification of results.
  • Minimising these risks requires learning from previous experiences to develop a clear rule book for the Paris Agreement, as well as institutional checks and balances. Managing these risks would help preserve the effectiveness (environmental integrity) and efficiency of RBP in REDD+, and thus its longterm political credibility and financing.
主题climate change ; ecosystem services ; mitigation ; emissions ; forests
URLhttps://www.cifor.org/library/7064/
来源智库Center for International Forestry Research (Indonesia)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/93972
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Dermawan, A.,Hospes, O.. Results-based payment: Who should be paid, and for what?. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
7064.jpg(7KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
BAngelsen180104.pdf(1256KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Dermawan, A.]的文章
[Hospes, O.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Dermawan, A.]的文章
[Hospes, O.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Dermawan, A.]的文章
[Hospes, O.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 7064.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: BAngelsen180104.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。