| 来源类型 | Articles
|
| 规范类型 | 论文
|
| ISBN | 978-602-387-079-0
|
| Results-based payment: Who should be paid, and for what? |
| Dermawan, A.; Hospes, O.
|
| 发表日期 | 2018
|
| 出处 | A. Angelsen, C. Martius, V. de Sy, A.E. Duchelle, A.M. Larson, Pham T.T. (eds.) Transforming REDD+: Lessons and new directions. 41-54
|
| 出版者 | Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia
|
| 出版年 | 2018
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | Key messages - Results-based payment (RBP), the main innovation brought by REDD+, has also been the most challenging to implement. Three key challenges for RBP are: what to pay for, how to set reference levels, and whom to pay; these challenges are at risk of biases, including a cherry picking of numbers.
- Current and emerging RBP initiatives are hybrid approaches. As such, they make compromises on key RBP principles, such as payment based solely on results, recipient discretion (on how to achieve results) and independent verification of results.
- Minimising these risks requires learning from previous experiences to develop a clear rule book for the Paris Agreement, as well as institutional checks and balances. Managing these risks would help preserve the effectiveness (environmental integrity) and efficiency of RBP in REDD+, and thus its longterm political credibility and financing.
|
| 主题 | climate change
; ecosystem services
; mitigation
; emissions
; forests
|
| URL | https://www.cifor.org/library/7064/
|
| 来源智库 | Center for International Forestry Research (Indonesia)
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/93972
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Dermawan, A.,Hospes, O.. Results-based payment: Who should be paid, and for what?. 2018.
|
|
文件名：
|
BAngelsen180104.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
