来源类型 | Briefs
|
规范类型 | 简报
|
DOI | 10.17528/cifor/005585
|
| Benefit sharing in context: A comparative analysis of 10 land-use change case studies in Indonesia |
| Blackie, R.; Sunderland, T.C.H.
|
发表日期 | 2015
|
出处 | CIFOR Infobrief no. 118
|
出版者 | Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia
|
出版年 | 2015
|
语种 | 英语
|
摘要 | Key points - In the absence of robust national or subnational policies for benefit sharing, land-use change initiatives in Indonesia have developed their own approaches to distributing benefits. At the local level, support and capacity building are needed to strengthen intermediary institutions in order to improve governance and increase legitimacy when deciding how to share benefits.
- Nonmonetary benefits such as land tenure, capacity building, infrastructure and access to natural resources have been especially important. However, in some cases there are nonmonetary burdens associated with intended benefits.
- The legitimacy of benefit-sharing arrangements is determined more by the actors involved than the type of land-use change associated with them. Conservation initiatives, REDD+ projects and oil palm initiatives all exhibited both high and low levels of legitimacy in their benefit-sharing arrangements.
- The legitimacy of benefit-sharing arrangements can be compromised by the lack of broad consultation with local actors including customary authorities, lack of community control over access to land snd limited livelihoods options for communities.
|
主题 | land use change
; benefit sharing
; land tenure
; capacity building
|
区域 | Indonesia
|
URL | https://www.cifor.org/library/5585/
|
来源智库 | Center for International Forestry Research (Indonesia)
|
引用统计 |
|
资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/94387
|
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 |
Blackie, R.,Sunderland, T.C.H.. Benefit sharing in context: A comparative analysis of 10 land-use change case studies in Indonesia. 2015.
|
文件名:
|
5585-infobrief.pdf
|
格式:
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。