G2TT
来源类型Briefs
规范类型简报
DOI10.17528/cifor/005745
What can REDD+ Benefit Sharing Mechanisms learn from the European Rural Development Policy?
Guariguata, M.R.; Rockwell, Cara A.
发表日期2015
出处CIFOR Infobrief no. 126
出版者Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia
出版年2015
语种英语
摘要

Key messages

  1. Designing incentives to achieve multiple objectives
  • The Rural Development Policy (RDP) provides lessons for REDD+ in its implementation of a single financial instrument that can coherently attend to different country needs, priorities and contexts with streamlined monitoring and funding allocations.
  • Differentiated payment calculations [applied at different levels] can account for contextual conditions increasing the likelihood that beneficiaries will perceive compensation as equitable, which motivates them to participate and comply with the scheme, and support the delivery of the desired outcomes.
  • Multi-level governance (MLG)
    • The RDP is at risk of being dominated by elite actors, especially when powers are decentralized and wider representation is not ensured. Elite capture is a common issue in forest management and requires specific attention within the context of REDD+ benefit distribution.
    • Although local level decision-making can enhance outcomes, evidence from the RDP suggests that overt top-down governance still prevents local actors from fully participating despite policy priorities to the contrary, even when local governance institutions are created. As such, REDD+ safeguards for procedural equity are important, but not necessarily sufficient, to counter these effects.
  • Monitoring and evaluation
    • Despite a strong commitment to monitoring, as impact indicators remain elusive, the available RDP output indicators currently provide only superficial insights into policy performance and are limited in their ability to assess the quality of activities in practice. Proxy indicators are needed, particularly for measuring the long-term outcomes and co-benefits of REDD+.
    • The RDP’s consistent monitoring and evaluation system is a strength that could be applied to REDD+. A qualitative evaluation approach should also be considered to complement quantitative indicators, account for data gaps, and capture other intangible policy/project aspects.
    主题REDD+ ; rural development ; policy
    区域Europe
    URLhttps://www.cifor.org/library/5745/
    来源智库Center for International Forestry Research (Indonesia)
    引用统计
    资源类型智库出版物
    条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/94403
    推荐引用方式
    GB/T 7714
    Guariguata, M.R.,Rockwell, Cara A.. What can REDD+ Benefit Sharing Mechanisms learn from the European Rural Development Policy?. 2015.
    条目包含的文件
    文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
    5745.jpg(37KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
    5745-infobrief.pdf(330KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
    个性服务
    推荐该条目
    保存到收藏夹
    导出为Endnote文件
    谷歌学术
    谷歌学术中相似的文章
    [Guariguata, M.R.]的文章
    [Rockwell, Cara A.]的文章
    百度学术
    百度学术中相似的文章
    [Guariguata, M.R.]的文章
    [Rockwell, Cara A.]的文章
    必应学术
    必应学术中相似的文章
    [Guariguata, M.R.]的文章
    [Rockwell, Cara A.]的文章
    相关权益政策
    暂无数据
    收藏/分享
    文件名: 5745.jpg
    格式: JPEG
    文件名: 5745-infobrief.pdf
    格式: Adobe PDF
    此文件暂不支持浏览

    除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。